Search results matching tag 'radiation'

Re: Lung Cancer

Dquixote1217 — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:16:51 GMT

Hello -

I am a natural health author, advocate and researcher (I regularly contribute to Natural News, healthiertalk, the Crusader and other outlets) and the author of the e-book "Cancer's Natural Enemy". I am not trying to sell anyone the book here, but I would like to let you and others know that oleander extract, especially when combined with the flaxseed and cottage cheese Budwig Diet elements along with a healthy overall anti-cancer regimen that addresses diet, lifestyle, proper nutrition and supplementation, and stress has been extremely successful against lung cancer.

One example is my own 86 year old uncle, who had lung cancer four years ago that mainstream oncology was unable to conquer. Instead, it began to spread to other parts of his body. He began taking the patented oleander medicine Anvirzel (and later on the herbal supplement Sutherlandia OPC, which is 80% oleander and 20% South Africa Cancer Bush), along with other elements in the suggested anti-cancer protocol I developed. Within a few months the cancer had stopped growing. Then it began to shrink and continued until only a small benign bit of scar-like tissue remained. Today he is cancer-free and enjoying a daily round of his beloved golf. And that is but one of many, any success stories.

I host a non-commercial informational health group on Yahoo (oleandersoup), which is over 5 years old and has over 1600 members there. In all that time, I am aware of fewer than a dozen people who have taken oleander in one form or another (you can also make your own home remedy version for pennies by carefully following directions) and followed other elements of my suggested protocol. The ones who are not still alive had prior surgery, chemo and/or radiation and were in very late stages when they joined.

After chemo, radiation and cancer it is not surprising to see that your friend feels so tired. All of those can take quite a toll on anyone, no matter what their previous shape and lifestyle has been. Proper nutrition and cleansing - and paying particular attention to the all-important liver and digestive system - can help restore his health in time. And a proper natural cancer fighting protocol may well be able to completely eliminate cancer and prevent its return.

Whatever course your friend takes, chemo and radiation are not likely to be the answer. Both merely try to remove the symptoms of cancer without addressing the underlying causes. Chemo damages healthy cells as well as cancer cells, often inflicting major organ damage (especially on the liver and heart), often contributes to the spread of the existing cancer, and paves the way for the return of the cancer upon a body whose natural first line of defense, the immune system, is less capable of warding it off than ever - and whose liver is likely further impaired and even less able to process and eliminate toxins (and the late great cancer pioneer Max Gerson observed that he never saw a single cancer patient who did not have an impaired liver). The same is pretty much true for radiation. It harms surrounding tissue and destroys bone marrow, a key component of the immune system.

If you or anyone else would like further information, including taking a look at my suggested protocol that has been successful over 90% of the time, you can find the protocol and a number of articles I have written about cancer at: www.tbyil.com/articles.htm

Be sure to read the Oleander Series and "Modern Medicine versus Nature in Treating Cancer".

Oleander and the protocol I advocate are among the very top recommended alternative treatments at Webster Kehr's cancertutor.com site, the International Wellness Directory, CureZone and many other alternative health sites. As a final note, the naturopathic PhD who developed the Sutherlandia OPC, which is available from his native South Africa (and the later stronger Rose Laural OPC which is sold within the US), also reports well over 95% success with well over 1000 people with cancer in South Africa and internationally which he has corresponded with.

All the best in health for your friend, yourself and everyone else,

Tony Isaacs

Crossed currents

bshubbard — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:33:00 GMT

There is now no dispute: electromagnetic fields (EMFs) harm our health. WDDTY has assembled the latest evidence that electrical and magnetic fields may be behind cases of ongoing puzzling illnesses like Alzheimer’s , amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and cancer. But the most shocking aspect of the EMF story is that it ever saw the light of day. The real story here is not that power lines are risky, but that the guardians of our health have so much interest invested in keeping that information from us.

When Bristol Professor Denis Henshaw began uncovering the first significant evidence of a link between power lines and childhood cancer, the UK’s National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) referred to such evidence as implausible and purely speculative.

Then, when the Oxford Childhood Cancer Research Group (CCRG), the largest-ever publicly funded UK study into power lines and cancer in children, presented its first results linking exposure to high-voltage power lines with childhood leukaemia, the Department of Health (DoH) kept the evidence hidden from public view for more than four years.

It was the Environmental Action Campaign, an independent activist organization, that eventually forced the DoH’s hand into making the findings public in 2004.

Although the NRPB has finally admitted to a likely relationship between power-frequency magnetic field exposure and cancer risk, the UK government is still unwilling to push for any law limiting exposure to power lines, mobile phones, WiFi and all other devices emitting EMFs.

Last year, a panel of 40 experts assembled to ‘discuss’ the government’s request that they examine how to cut public exposure to power lines. That panel included a number of members of the industry, who continued to fight against the strongest measures, such as burying lines underground or creating an ‘avoidance corridor’ around power lines where new buildings cannot be erected.

In the US, the California Department of Health Sciences led a $7m initiative—the
California EMF Project—which analyzed all research and concluded that there was strong evidence that magnetic fields are a likely cause of leukaemia, brain cancer, spontaneous abortions and ALS.
Nevertheless, no body within the US government has rushed to do anything about it.

At the moment, virtually all standards are based on the assumption that the only concerns with such fields are to do with tissue-heating or induced electrical currents in the body; any other effects are still not understood.
Yet, in a 2007 BioInitiative Report, a team of 14 international scientists, arguing for a
public-exposure standard for EMFs, concluded that it is electromagnetic radiation (rather than heat) that causes biological changes.

As noted by the EMF Project, other environmental concerns that have smaller health risks are subject to tougher regulation, even when the mechanisms of the risk are not understood. We still don’t know, for example, how smoking causes cancer; nevertheless, the restrictions on the tobacco industry continue to grow.
The reason for all the foot-dragging is clear. Electromagnetic fields are rather like the modern banking industry: since the discovery of electricity, they have underpinned our modern lifestyle. Any attempt to responsibly restrict the vast network of industry that creates, makes or uses EMFs would also severely limit new technologies (such as mobiles and WiFi ), which is tantamount to driving a stake into the very heart of our economic system.

Nevertheless, as the BioInitiative Report argues, admitting that there is problem and then defining new exposure standards is a very good place to start.

The Power Lines special report is now available to all new subscribers to ‘What Doctors Don't Tell You’, who take out a full subscription (note: the report is not available to those who take up a trial, £4.99, subscription).
To subscribe, and receive the Power Lines special report, please follow this link:
http://www.wddtyhealthshop.com/products.asp?recnumber=246
Note: All new subscribers who pay at the full price also receive a CD that contains nearly 20 years of health research, compiled by the WDDTY team. The CD usually retails for £200 ($300).

Re: cancer second time around - age 31!

detoxqueen — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:16:22 GMT

That's good news indeed! What did she do for it?

I feel it's very important to remove the residues of the chemo and acidic waste that's produced by conventional treatments like chemo and radiation to increase the lifespan.

I've put together a file of resources of what I'd personally do if I had cancer. Feel free to email me and I'll send it to you or anyone else reading this.

Cigarettes and mobile phones

bshubbard — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:51:00 GMT

Those of you old enough to witness the descent of the cigarette, from essential accessory for the sophisticate to Evil Incarnate, within two generations may be getting a sense of deja vu right now.

This time round it's the turn of the mobile, or cell, phone, which, over the past 15 years, has become the essential accessory for everyone who needs to tell everyone else everything you are doing at every moment.

Research has been quietly telling us that long-term mobile phone use can result in brain tumours, but these studies have usually been dismissed as the ravings of mavericks and madmen.

Despite this, UK government health officials have been warning us that children in particular may be especially vulnerable to radiation from the phones. Last week, Canada's health guardians voiced similar concerns, and this week the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute has warned faculty and staff to cut down on cell phone usage.

Others, including those in the pay of the mobile phone industry, continue to ridicule these concerns, but the doom-sayers are making a reasonable point. They are effectively saying: we don't yet know the long-term effects of persistent mobile phone usage, so it's better to be safe than sorry.

Cut to 40 years ago, and you can see a similar pattern over cigarette smoking. The manufacturers were even claiming that cigarettes were healthy, something that the mobile phone operators aren't saying, at least. The tobacco industry produced their own studies to 'prove' cigarettes weren't a health concern, something the mobile phone industry has also done.

It'll be interesting to see, if in 40 years' time, mobile phones are also banned from every public place, and each phone comes with a health warning.

Re: Radiation Complications

Jane Kibbler — Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:27:41 GMT

There's a homoepathic remedy called Rad Br which is given to patients who've had problems since receiving radiation treatment. Amongst its treatable symptoms lists Dry mouth and Aching of the jaw. It doesn't mention growths but it's worth a try at only £5 or so. Brief information is on this site. http://abchomeopathy.com/r.php/Rad-b

Radiation Complications

enews — Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:43:26 GMT

Since having radiation therapy for tonsil cancer eighteen months ago, this reader’s sister has experienced troubling side effects. She is no longer able to produce saliva and she keeps developing growths on her jaw, which cause a tremendous amount of pain. In the last six months, three growths have been removed but tests have revealed nothing. Can readers offer any advice for dealing with these problems? Are there any natural remedies that could help?

According to one reader, antioxidants are the answer to this problem. “Antioxidants can repair tissue damage caused by radiation poisoning,” she says. Specifically, she recommends a nutritional supplement called Vibe, which apparently has the highest certified antioxidant potency of any liquid supplement. “Take the full dose each time for three months,” explains our reader. “Eventually it will start to clear up. But really you should probably take it for the rest of you life for the anticancer properties.”

Another reader recommends homeopathy: “There's a homeopathic remedy called Radium bromatum, which is given to patients who've had problems since receiving radiation treatment. Amongst its treatable symptoms it lists dry mouth and aching of the jaw…it’s worth a try.” Alternatively, see a qualified homeopath for an individual prescription.