Alla,
Let's take a look at some of your statements:
Alla Cranham:I agree with you, Adrienne: the group with health problems could well show the adverse reactions, and I believe that's the main reason for all previous sad cases with vaccination. I was trying to get this message across to the readers here for quite some time…
1. Could it be that people without health problems are able to detox the toxic waste substances which are part of vaccines better and therefore do not suffer any immediate consequences of vaccinations?
2. If people with health problems can be harmed by vaccines, is it not so that this shows that vaccines are dangerous? If somebody has health problems, there is a weakened immune system. Because of this, the toxic substances in vaccines cannot be defended against and as a result, the vaccine causes damage. This would show beyond a shadow of a doubt that vaccines are indeed toxic and that it is a logical and moral fallacy to inject healthy and already unhealthy people with such substances. A health promoting substance does neither harm the healthy nor the unhealthy.
Alla Cranham: The doctors should not allow vaccination in patients who have current health problems or infections. Some health conditions can be present asymptomatically (including mental health problems) and can not be detected with available methods until developed further but could be triggered if immune system is compromised with vaccination. In my opinion, the doctors are trying to shift responsibilities for vaccine adverse reactions onto the scientists by saying about toxic ingredients and foreign tissues in vaccine formulation, and because they work closely with the public, general public tends to believe to what they say. However, the scientists say that the adverse effects can take place if the patient received vaccination when he/she already had some undetected health problem which is then brought to the surface upon vaccine administration. Many substances around us and inside us can be toxic to the body (including vitamins): the toxic effect depends on their concentration in the body. The body copes with mild toxicity thanks to the natural mechanism called homeostasis which can be disrupted if excessively challenged. I tend to believe to what scientists say otherwise EVERY clinical trials participant would produce adverse reaction and the vaccine would never passed the clinical trials.
3. What first hand knowledge do you have that vitamines can be toxic?
4. Contrary to vaccines, vitamines used to be part of our food. These days, our soils are depleted of minerals and vitamines thanks to chemical fertilisers and pesticides which are a courtesy of the same chemical companies which produce such things as vaccines and other allopathic drugs.
Don't you think that it is possible that the general population is so vitamine and mineral deficient that illnesses like cancer can develop much more easily?
5. Do you have first hand knowledge that the clinical trials you mention are unbiased, correct, comprehesnive and, as a matter of fact, proof safety?
If you do not have first hand knowledge, could it be that your belief as expressed above is nothing but blind faith?
Dear People,
Unless we can personally verify and understand or experience the facts behind a claim, we have no evidence whatosever. Every humna being is unique. No scientist in the world can claim that anything is safe just because he has run a trial on a few dozens of people for a veru short period of time.
What I would do in case a "health authority" or doctor would urge me to get my children vaccinated is the following:
1. Draft a liability agreement titled Private Acceptance of unlimited liability.
2. Present this agreement to the doctor (take two witnesses with you) and ask him/her to sign it in his private capacity (not as a doctor) accepting all costs for care and damages to an unlimited amount for any damage caused by any vaccine up to and including the age 60.
3. Let the two witnesses sign the same document.
I am pretty sure that no doctor would sign such agreement simply because nobody can know whether the vaccine will be safe for your child. At least, our doctor did not sign it.
Instead, the doctor will present you with a piece of paper asking you to sign that yo do not wish your child(ren) to be vacinated. I would not sign any such paper as it can and will be used by the government to "prove" that you were acting negligently by refusing advice from a "health professional".
It all comes down to you personally. If you allow your children to be vaccinated because you believe that it is the right thing to do, it is your choice. However, do not blame doctors and "scientists" if anything goes wrong. Always ask to read the flyer coming with each vaccine before giving consent for your child to be vaccinated. You will be surprised. Ask yourself this: "What do I really know about the safety of the vaccine or the illness which some unknown third party claims the vaccine to be a protection against?"
Now the usual legal stuff:
Nothing in the above is intended to be legal or medical advice in any shape or form. If you need medical advice consult a licensed practitioner. If you need legal advice, consult a solicitor or lawyer.