Hi Sue,
Of course no one is obliged to flow advice given here or anywhere else. Of course we are very privileged to live in World where freedom of expression is possible for many. But this freedom comes with certain responsibilities. Advertising should not be misleading for example. Its perfectly fair for ordinary folks to expect not to receive misleading or dangerous advice, for example.
As far as I am concerned, if someone advises someone else to drink hydrogen peroxide on a website claiming to give health advice then that is misleading. Someone needs to step in and say ‘hang on, that is dangerous, don’t listen to this person' (which is exactly what I did). Anyone reading this website is then better equipped to decide whether the advice was good, or just plain daft.
I also pointed out the inconsistencies in the overall content of the website- many references to the general malign influence of environmental chemicals and agents such as EM radiation, yet testimonies to the cancer treating properties of hydrogen peroxide (bleach). Constant references to the bizarre principles of homeopathy, then sudden acceptance of the laws of physics when it comes to diluting hydrogen peroxide (or using a computer and the internet for that matter).
Its great to be able to account ones own experiences and successes. But sadly this is no indication whatsoever how similar interventions might affect other people (aren't we always saying people are individuals and what works for one doesn't for the other?) But when someone recounts an apocryphal success story, on a website claiming to give health advice, then you could see how rather than empowering, the information could become misleading.
It was not anger in my post btw, it was sheer and utter incredulity.