in Search

Lynne McTaggart - What Doctors Don't Tell You

A systems approach to breathing problems

Doctors fail to conquer disease, in the main, because they are not taught to think globally. They usually consider each system in isolation. A heart attack is due to clogged pipes feeding the central engine. A pain in the arm must originate in the arm.

Two strong counterpoints to the medical model have recently come to light—both involving breathing problems. Medicine has always regarded run-of-the-mill breathing disorders like snoring and mouth-breathing as quirks that affect no one other than the person sharing the snorer’s bed.

However, startling new evidence has come to light that problems with breathing appear to have profound effects on the developing brain, and a diminished oxygen supply may be an important cause of attention and memory deficits, hyperactivity and learning disorders. So basic and central is oxygen to the brain’s ability to process information that the effects can be permanent if the breathing problems aren’t sorted early.

This would make perfect sense to anyone with a systems approach to biology. Any diminution of the central supply of nourishment will affect every part of the whole.

The reason that the tools of modern medicine so often don’t work is that medical scientists have yet to develop perfectly targeted drugs. Most medicine itself is systemic: it doesn’t only affect the area of the body the doctor wishes to treat, but scatters its effects into every cell. As with everything else in the universe, the components of our body exist only in relationship. Until doctors are able to think big, they will continue to be blind to obvious causes of certain diseases and the disastrous effects of their medical ‘solutions’.

You can read about these new discoveries in your trial issue of What Doctors Don't Tell You.  Just click here to order your free copy

Published 24 October 2007 14:35 by Lynne McTaggart

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

Graham Ewing said:

At long last you starting to see the light.  You may wish to consider how the physiological systems are associated with the regulation of the body's health and wellbeing whereas pathophysiology is obsessed with the study of the processes of illness.  

Virtual Scanning is the only available technology which has been developed which uses an understanding of how the body's function is regulated by the physiological systems and hence how this can be used to stimulate good health.

Graham

October 30, 2007 14:58
 

Harradine said:

The beleif that doctors "consider each system in isolation" or that they are not taught to think "globally" is quite false.  There are literally hundred of examples from every day medical practice that demonstrate that this simply isn't the case.

Heart disease and cancer are two very common illness.  Conventional medical advice begins with preventative treatments, such as a healthy diet, excercise, avoiding smoking and alcohol, stress etc.  None of these approaches are based on a view that the systems of the body should be studied in isolation.

Medical science studies all the organ systems and how they interact with one another to perform the functions of a working body.  How the function of the kidneys is essential for blood pressure and heart rhythms, how hormonal secretions for the endocrine glands affects almost all systems of the body.  How the function of the brain is essential for correct co-ordination of so many systems.

That's the reality.  The view that medical science advocates, for example, that "a heart attak must be due to clogged pipes" is simply wrong.  Conventional medicine knows (and advises) that, using your example, a heart attack can be due to poor diet, a lack of excercise, obesity, chronic stress, genetic problems, diabetes, smoking, etc.  Lifestyle factors are just as much a part of conventional medical treatment as anything else.

I'm afraid your statements are fundamentally misguided.

Regards

H

October 31, 2007 17:22
 

My Alternative Cancer Diary said:

My decision to become a nutritionist was directly related to my own experiences using nutrition to cure

December 17, 2007 11:50
 

Donal Doherty said:

Modern medical science is based on treating symptoms, rather than addressing the route cause. Treating symptoms is not inherently a bad thing. Failing to address the route cause is nonsensical at best.

When some estimates suggest that up to 25% of oxygen intake is consumed by the brain, it's not a great stretch to imagine that brain function will suffer as intake is reduced.

If modern medical science where truly systemic, the musclo-skeletal system is the most obvious, quickest and most cost effective place to look first - it can been observed by the naked (and trained) eye.

Rounding of the upper back and shoulders, collapsing of the chest and tilting of the pelvis are all clues that the function of the diaphragm (the 'breathing muscle')  is compromised and the airways are misaligned.

Think of how a vacuum cleaner makes funny noises and looses suction (which is just ramped up intake of air) when it's pipe (airway) becomes impinged.

There can of course be other contributing or causative factors, but this does not excuse the failure to look at the simplest and to treat it accordingly by non-invasive corrective means.

January 28, 2008 21:19

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit
Terms and conditions | Advertise | About us | Contact us

(C) 2006 Copyright Conatus plc. All Rights Reserved.