in Search

My Alternative Cancer Diary

What the Doctor Said

When my appointment with the consultant came around, I went with much trepidation, but at the same time was anxious to get it over with so I could know the worst.  

My worst fears were confirmed when the consultant explained that because they had found some cancerous cells that were starting to come through from the original site in the ducts of the breast, it was no longer DCIS (or Ductal Carcinoma In Situ) but Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.  It was a slow growing type and was at stage 1-2.  He told me that there was a good likelihood that the cancer could be stopped by removing my left breast and some of the lymph nodes would be removed for testing at the same time. There may also be the possibility of taking Taxoxifen for a while afterwards if the cancer was oestrogen dependent.

I instinctively said “NO!” as soon as he said this, and my husband asked if there was anything else they could do besides this as it seemed such a drastic step to take for such a small area that had not been causing me any bother up until now.  He sadly shook his head and repeated what he had told me.  

I hadn’t put much thought into it up until then but at the back of my mind I vaguely remembered something I had read about an alternative treatment involving apricots and apple seeds, but couldn’t remember what.  

I said I would go away and think about it, and would give my answer in a few days.  He said that time was of the essence and it should not be left for too long. 

Arrangements were made for the breast care nurse to call in a few days’ time and go over what the operation would entail. “Don’t worry,” the consultant said as we left, “We’ll look after you”.  Somehow I wasn’t reassured.

This post is part of a weekly series in which Sue Insole describes her health journey.  Her first post, The Letter Every Woman Dreads, describes the painful process of being diagnosed with breast cancer.  Next week, Sue discusses the impact her condition had on her family, and explains how she started to think about alternative treatments.

Click here to get an email update when Sue writes her next post.


SUSAN INSOLE, BSYA (N Th.) is a former NHS nurse and is now a nutritional therapist in the field of natural health.  She worked in a health care setting for 16 years, firstly in the field of rehabilitation and then as a welfare officer and secretary within a hospital setting.  She was also an advisor for weight loss in 2001 - 2003. She achieved a diploma in 2006 for nutritional therapy. She is the author of a downloadable eBook, What Works in Health. Her website is: www.naturalhealthbenefits.com

Published 10 September 2007 11:37 by Sue Insole

Comments

 

Dr. Johns said:

I rebelled many years ago against my profession for refusing to update its procedures dealing with cancer.  Breakthroughs in cancer therapy were and are deliberately bypassed.  Ther public suffers, dies, all the time hearing little of alterntive therapy and its success.

September 11, 2007 19:43
 

Nick Edmonds said:

Hi,

I am currently studying NT.  My brother ecently died of a cancer - more precisely the chemotherapy.  He put his faith in conventional medicine rather than the alternatives.  My chief beef is that the medical profession ignore the fact that the body defences have stopped working or have been overwhelmed and so do nothing to restore them.  As an NT, I cannot understand why you are not familar with the many alt therapies.  There are so many books these days.  The original is Gerson, updated by Lawrence Plaskett.  See what  Marucs Sirus has to say http://web.mac.com/medicalveritas/iWeb/Sanctuary%20Cancer%20Clinic/Home.html.  Two of the most useful books I found are "Cancer - Step Outside the Box " 978-0978806507 and "Beating Cancer with Nutrition" 978-0963837295.  Treatment has to be a whole commitment to using the right foods, not just finding a single agent.  However the treatment using appricot pits (the kernel in the stone) is laetrile or vitamin B17. The book "World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17"  978-0912986197  is meant to be the best on laetrile.

For obvious reasons laetrile is controvertial and discredited, http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/help/default.asp?page=21859 but used in clinics in Mexico.    For more about many other therapies see http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/cancer1/altthrpy.htm

...and I wish you well in your recovery.

Warm regards

September 12, 2007 11:36
 

Elana Green said:

My husband has been diagonosed with RectalCancer and has undergone an operation ashhe is 84years old Chemortherapy is not recommended however Radiation has been suggested. We are not happy about that and would like to have some other opinions. My husband does not believe in Homeopathy but if I could give hima quality of life for the next few years I would be mroe than grateful.

September 13, 2007 00:35
 

Jess Lawrence said:

I have treated a recurrence of colon cancer successfully using the CAAT diet administered under the A P John Cancer Insitute in Florida.  

http://www.apjohncancerinstitute.org/

You don't have to go there or live there they will coordinate the treatment from Florida and will send you everything you need here. They will be fully involved in your care from the start.

It is a biochemically based  diet that starves cancer cells by depriving them of nutrients: specifically of glucose, sugars, carbohydrates and the particular amino acids that cancer cells need to survive. They have very different metabolic needs to normal cells. Normal cells utilise the krebs cycle but cancer cells primarily use glycolysis for their energy. The treatment exploits this and deprives them of their energy source.

The dietary routine is extremely regimented but it sures beats chemotherapy!!

I think its the right cancer treatment for the elderly and for all those who are vulnerable and may not be able to withstand the rigours of chemo and radiation.However you can still utilise the diet  with chemo and radiation to make them work better.  

September 25, 2007 19:09
 

Susan Insole said:

Thanks for all your comments and shared experiences.  At the time of my diagnosis I was not studying Nutrition in any great depth but knew in my heart of hearts by my experiences with medical treatment (and in my previous job) that it was not likely to work for me.  I went along with the medical options in the beginning by listening to what they were proposing (as you do when you are suffering from shock) but sort of knew that it was not the way to go.  It was only later when I grew stronger in my conviction that I refused to have any medical treatment.

I do wonder how many people passively accept medical treatment when they are overwhelmed by shock and despair, and only hear negative comments about alternatives (usually from their doctors).  Unfortunately by the time they accept that medical treatments are not working, their bodies have been ravaged by chemo and radiation and their immune system is  overwhelmed - so it becomes so much harder for the body to respond to alternatives.

I would always recommend the nutritional appraoch for vulnerable and elderly people who would probably not withstand the rigours of medical treatment - and a better diet overall has to be the best way to help the immune system. Our bodies have great recuperative powers and should be given a helping hand rather than be destroyed.

November 10, 2007 13:34
Anonymous comments are disabled
Terms and conditions | Advertise | About us | Contact us

(C) 2006 Copyright Conatus plc. All Rights Reserved.