in Search

Adverse Reactions

Cigarettes and mobile phones

Those of you old enough to witness the descent of the cigarette, from essential accessory for the sophisticate to Evil Incarnate, within two generations may be getting a sense of deja vu right now.

This time round it's the turn of the mobile, or cell, phone, which, over the past 15 years, has become the essential accessory for everyone who needs to tell everyone else everything you are doing at every moment.

Research has been quietly telling us that long-term mobile phone use can result in brain tumours, but these studies have usually been dismissed as the ravings of mavericks and madmen.

Despite this, UK government health officials have been warning us that children in particular may be especially vulnerable to radiation from the phones.  Last week, Canada's health guardians voiced similar concerns, and this week the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute has warned faculty and staff to cut down on cell phone usage.

Others, including those in the pay of the mobile phone industry, continue to ridicule these concerns, but the doom-sayers are making a reasonable point.  They are effectively saying: we don't yet know the long-term effects of persistent mobile phone usage, so it's better to be safe than sorry.

Cut to 40 years ago, and you can see a similar pattern over cigarette smoking.  The manufacturers were even claiming that cigarettes were healthy, something that the mobile phone operators aren't saying, at least.  The tobacco industry produced their own studies to 'prove' cigarettes weren't a health concern, something the mobile phone industry has also done.

It'll be interesting to see, if in 40 years' time, mobile phones are also banned from every public place, and each phone comes with a health warning.

Published 25 July 2008 17:51 by Bryan Hubbard

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

wisdom said:

I really wish there was some concrete evidence one way or the other.

July 28, 2008 05:20
 

Anne Murray said:

I know they are bad for me - I get a distinct heaviness round the ear I was using even after very short calls. They are very useful but I keep calls to the absolute minimum.

July 29, 2008 14:52
 

Maria said:

My car (Volvo) came with a hands-free kit built into the stereo.  I just have to put my simcard in.  Does anyone know if when I am driving along talking, these are just as bad as putting a phone next to my head?  I used to use my mobile phone a lot, for some long (hour long calls :( ) up until a few years ago.  I am much more wary now and do not like to carry it on me either - but has the damage been done?  

July 29, 2008 15:00
 

bj clark said:

I have read that hands free cell phone use in an automobile is also a problem

because the requirement is heightened to get the signal so the car is filled with

higher levels of microwave or electromagnetic field.

The vehicle, a metal capsule, serves to intensify the effect.  This would be

the same while taxiing in on an airplane only magnified by the numbers of

passengers using their cell phones.

In my profession, a clinical practice of 32 years, it is customary even necessary to have a cell phone, but I never have had one because of the potential danger to my

physical health that already compromised.  By God's grace He worked it all out.

July 29, 2008 18:51
 

June Russell said:

Want more info about cell phone dangers? I have referenced material on my website on this topic - "CELL PHONE SAFETY." (Also other health topics).

June Russell - www.jrussellshealth.org

russells@embarqmail.com

August 2, 2008 21:03
 

pauline said:

I know I damaged my head using a mobile phone and no research or studies will convince me otherwise.  

After several months of heavy work-related use, I developed bilateral headaches that nothing would relieve and a bruised feeling on my scalp as if someone had tried to pull my hair out.  I sought medical help but was told mobile phones were safe.  Noting a direct correlation between the onset of the symptoms and mobile use, I gave up the mobile altogether and no longer suffer unless I am too close to another mobile user.  

My friends laugh because, if I see somebody move to make a call, I run away.  I'd rather look silly than be in pain for a week (even a two second call does that to me). The danger of passive smoking is accepted and hopefully one day passive microwave radiation damage will be too.  

One study I read by a Prof Hocking suggested skull nerve ending damage  and that is possibly what has happened to me.  I've been back to the doctor and insisted that he note that there is a direct correlation between my symptoms and mobile phone use.

August 5, 2008 13:35
 

Rachel Charlton said:

I have never had a mobile phone as I dont want to take the risk. We managed before without them, I think people just think they cant manage without them.

August 5, 2008 15:31
 

Daphne said:

For expert information, google Dr George Carlo and the Safe Wireless Initiative:

Dr. George Carlo, Ph.D, M.S., J.D, is a public health scientist, epidemiologist, lawyer, and the founder of the Science and Public Policy Institute. Dr. Carlo headed the $28.5 million research program funded by the cell phone industry from 1993 to 1999. Dr. Carlo has appeared on 20/20, 60 Minutes, World News Tonight, CBS News with Dan Rather and The Today's Show, as well as on CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC.

MAST SANITY BRIEFING - PRESENTATION BY DR GEORGE CARLO – LONDON - 22 FEBRUARY 2007

August 12, 2008 16:29

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit

This Blog

Syndication

News

FREE REPORT: Discover 100 ways to live to be 100 This special report includes 100 great tips to help you live longer and healthier – right up to the age of 100. This report is available for download right now – and it’s free. Click here to claim your copy.
Terms and conditions | Advertise | About us | Contact us

(C) 2006 Copyright Conatus plc. All Rights Reserved.