in Search

Adverse Reactions

The poisoned brain

Are we poisoning our children to the extent that they can't function in the classroom?

A new study into the abilities of children in the UK who are failing basic exams known as SATS has discovered that 55 per cent have an undetected learning problem such as dyslexia.

If this were extrapolated across the nation, the numbers of British children with learning difficulties would be around 2 million, 20 times the 76,000 who are currently officially recognised as having dyslexia and the like.

Whenever studies like this are published - and always they seem to suggest a problem that's more more prevalent than government figures ever admit - experts explain that dyslexia is related to genetic factors.  If this were always the case, we shouldn't be seeing an explosion in the numbers of children who are struggling at school.

A more interesting possibility comes from developmental psychologist Maryanne Wolf who, in her excellent book 'Proust and the Squid', explains that reading is a facility we learn and, as we do, so we 'educate' our neural networks that create new pathways that enable us to read and write.  In a fascinating aside, she says the Chinese have completely different neural pathways in their brain that have been created by their own language and character set.

If this is so, something other than genetics may also be playing a part in slowing - or stopping - the creation of the neural pathways required for reading. 

In a separate study published this week, researchers have discovered that diesel fumes affect the way our brain functions, although they don't yet know if our abilities are also impaired by these pollutants (see our News section).  This suggests that our brains may be affected by a range of environmental and chemical assaults - not just diesel fumes, but also pesticides, electro-pollution, and pharmaceuticals - and the affect may be far worse in young and developing brains.

Over the past 50 years or so, we've been cavalier in our use of petro-chemicals and electro-magnetic technology.  We've sprayed our crops with pesticides, we've given our children mobile phones, and we've vaccinated them with more than 20 different chemicals - all in the name of progress, and a safer and healthier world.

The legacy may be a generation that has more children with cognitive difficulties than ever before.  Perhaps it's time to reconsider the level of poisons to which we expose our children.  The alternative would be catastrophic.

 

 

 

Published 14 March 2008 11:46 by Bryan Hubbard

Comments

 

graham said:

Dear Bryan,

Montague Healthcare will shortly submit an article for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.  It reports the findings which we made when assessing children with dyslexia. Much of this is already reported in our book 'Virtual Scanning - a new generation of healthcare - beyond biomedicine?' in which we discuss how the autonomic nervous system egulates the physiological systems and organs and how medical problems affect the function of the various systems and organs in the body - including the sensory organs.

What you are now reporting is what we have been reporting for the past 3-4 years.

The article nearing completion goes into this matter in very much greater detail and discusses the limitations of existing theories.

Graham

March 18, 2008 16:10
 

Mike Maybury said:

There are four further causes that should considered.

1. In some deprived families, where parents and siblings also have learning difficulties, the lack of reading material, hearing stories and proper use of language at home must surely contribute to learning difficulties.

2. The lack of whole grain foods, natural pulses and a wide range of vegetables and fruit in the daily diet must surely contribute to problems.

3. Lack of exercise and time in the fresh air and sunlight as well as social interaction with people of all ages may also contribute to learning difficulties, surely.

4. Other pollutants from homes should also be considered. Many new plastic products and composition wood products emanate many fumes apparently, as do fabrics and clothes treated with fire retardants.

March 18, 2008 18:24
 

John Parfitt said:

I recently read of some research which shows that countries whose languages have regular spelling systems from which the sound of words can easily and consistently be deduced have fewer dyslexic children than those whose spelling is (like English) highly irregular, especially in the commonest words. Support spelling reform!

March 25, 2008 17:53
 

Ana said:

I absolutely agree with Mr. John Parfitt.

I came from a country where we read and write phonetically (one letter-one sound), and dyslexia is virtually non-existent there. Children start school when they are 7 years old, and most of them can already read and write fluently. I am frustrated to see my 7 years old in this country struggling with reading and writing English, whereas she was able to read in our language before she was 4. I spend almost 15 years in this country, and after I have done my A levels here, and being half way through my degree course in Nutritional Medicine, I still can not spell properly. Thank God for spelling correctors!! I have done A level in French, and did not have any difficulties because their language has rules. English language has really simple grammar, but spelling is just unbelievable! Government is putting so much resources into education in order to teach children to read and write, whereas money could  have been spent on spelling reform, and that would certainly be a long term solution.

March 25, 2008 22:32
 

Pat said:

When considering the levels of poor reading and writing  in the UK, I very rarely see mention of the numbers of children born with 'brain damage'. My daughter was but this terminology is no longer used and she is now labelled as having 'learning difficulties'. It wouldn't matter to her which spelling rule was applied, she simply cannot perceive words normally. Furthermore, her comprehension is impaired to a high degree which makes reading almost irrelevant to her as she cannot absorb the meaning of what she struggles to 'read'. The effort of working out  the sound in each word, means she very often forgets the whole word when she comes to the end of it and how it fits into the meaning of a sentence/story.

'Learning difficulties' implies there will be some progress/improvement.. Without constant revision and consolidation my daughter, now aged 35, has little chance of ever being labelled 'literate'. How many more young children and adults are like her, added into the statistics and therefore completely distorting these?

Without life-long literacy support there is little chance of her progressing beyond to a 'recognition' of a few very large printed signs such as Toilets, Ladies, In, Out - but don't expect her to write them down from 'memory'. The other words relating to her shopping needs are irrelevant and recognition of packaging is her guide.  

August 27, 2008 10:17
Anonymous comments are disabled

This Blog

Syndication

News

FREE REPORT: Discover 100 ways to live to be 100 This special report includes 100 great tips to help you live longer and healthier – right up to the age of 100. This report is available for download right now – and it’s free. Click here to claim your copy.
Terms and conditions | Advertise | About us | Contact us

(C) 2006 Copyright Conatus plc. All Rights Reserved.