in Search

Adverse Reactions

Why it's wrong to take a statin a day

Take a statin a day if you're male and over 50, a health expert has told us this week.  Prof Robert Boyle, the UK's adviser on heart and stroke health, reckons the drug should be taken along with the morning Corn Flakes in order to keep in check high cholesterol levels.

He's right to be concerned: heart disease and stroke is the major killer in the West.  But he's wrong about the remedy.

Statins such as Zocor, Zocord and Lipitor do indeed reduce levels of the 'bad' LDL cholesterol, but scientists are beginning to see cholesterol as the big red herring of modern medicine.  At best, a high cholesterol level seems to be nothing more than a marker of a heart problem, not the cause of one. 

Even if you don't buy that, there are more effective ways of keeping cholesterol levels down, such as through exercise and diet, and without the need for drug dependency.  Statins are also not quite as safe as everyone at first believed.  A recent report has found that they can increase the chance of cancer, but more common effects include liver toxicity and hepatitis, inflammation and pain in the muscles, blurred vision, headache, nausea and skin rash.

The truth is that medicine still doesn't fully understand the subtle and complex mechanisms of heart health, and the role that cholesterol plays.  Until we do, use statins only with caution, and certainly not every day with the Corn Flakes.

And, while you're about it, drop the Corn Flakes too and try some fruit instead.

Published 03 August 2007 12:29 by Bryan Hubbard

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

JOSEPH PUTNOKI said:

Actually  we do know  how cholesterol is involved.  The cascade of events starts with  metabolic,  chemical, biological actions that injure the  lumen.  White bllod cells rush to combat the substances or pathogenes, cholesterol is trying to plug the injury, both trapped and become part pf plaque buildup.  The injurious substances, including excessive animal fats AND  OUR OWN ADIPOSE TISSUES produce  citokines  which provoke  subclinical inflammation in addition to the former triggers.

It is not cholesterol but the silent inflammation provoked  is what the problem is.  Statins'  positive effect  is not what it was invented for (to lower cholestereol) but by its anti inflammatory effect, albeit at a cost! Safe alternatives  do exist!

August 4, 2007 12:35
 

Benjamin Fitts said:

Statins seem to work for some people but others have serious side effects.

A couple of friends love their statins.

My dad however has memory problems and scans actually show a black spot on his brain after taking them for several months.

Statins are certainly not right for everyone!

Thanks for sharing.

August 6, 2007 16:03
 

Brennan Kingsland said:

I would suggest a thorough discussion with your MD before making a final decision on statins. Negative side effects are a risk with almost every medication, but as a Coronary Critical Care RN, I believe benefits must be weighed against the risks. For some individuals, even trying more natural alternatives is not sufficient. My husband's family has a genetic history of cholesterol-related diseases. He has flat-lined five times and been resuscitated with heart-related issues. Thus far, he has lived longer than any member of his family and his heart attacks have stopped, secondary to a medication regime that includes a daily statin. Yes, there are side effects to statins, but death is a BAD side-effect of NOT taking the medication when it is needed.

As a licensed RN, I would never presume to give medical advice (could lose my license), BUT while I think it is important that we humans take responsibility for our own health, countermanding a physician's order is not necessarily the wisest or safest approach.

Talk with your doctor before making your final decision. Your life may depend on it.

August 7, 2007 17:30
 

dgtucker said:

Interesting viewppoints....but I fail to understand why or how, a potentially life threatening drug is preferable to addressing the underlying causes with correct nutrition and exercise?

Every thing in the UK is 'Low fat'....except the population and that shoud tell us something.

Sugars, HFC,processed carbs, sedentry lifestyle....these need to be looked at and sorted, for herein lies the arteriole sclerosis/inflammation problems I believe.

........Saturated fats are in fact essential and not really a problem for most, in heart disease.

See mercola.com for more detail and sensible information, research and logic!

August 17, 2007 00:55
 

roseanne lannigan said:

having used statins only for a few weeks have fought with doc for nearly two years have now been told my ck levels are sky high and have terrible pains and stiffness and memory loss due to this now awaiting rheumatologist appointment dont recommend these at all dangerous

October 11, 2007 20:11
 

Peter Fryer said:

I`ve been taking Lipitor 10 mg for the past 4 months and last night experienced a weird sensation when the outside of my vision became like ripples on water. Needless to say I`ll be making an appointment with my doctor to discuss this. It may or may not be related!

October 23, 2007 10:54

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit

This Blog

Syndication

News

FREE REPORT: Discover 100 ways to live to be 100 This special report includes 100 great tips to help you live longer and healthier – right up to the age of 100. This report is available for download right now – and it’s free. Click here to claim your copy.
Terms and conditions | Advertise | About us | Contact us

(C) 2006 Copyright Conatus plc. All Rights Reserved.